PHP Cache-Buster Option

Meet MetsGrrl

Twitter

Search















Monday, May 18, 2009

SPEECHLESS.

Picture 1

Speechless is not me trying to figure out how to describe Pelfrey’s record-breaking balks last night (prompting me to offer that perhaps he needed ballet lessons - I was serious about that, by the way).  Speechless is not my reaction to our inability to get runners home last night. Speechless is not my reaction to the Mets winning three out of four, nor is it my reaction to Jon Miller’s yellow-on-yellow ensemble (anyone got a picture of that?), to Jerry’s decision to pinch hit Angel Pagan, or to Miller’s ability to continually confuse Gary Sheffield with Daniel Murphy.

No, speechless is my reaction to the trainwreck that is the ESPN Sunday Night Baseball team of Miller, Morgan and Phillips. #espnbaseballsucks was a almost a trending topic on Twitter last night, and not just from Mets fans; all over the country, bloggers, sportswriters and just plain folks of my acquaintance shared my reaction to the on-air debacle that was last night’s commentary. Instead of providing the viewing public with the job they were sent out there to do, which is in-game commentary, we were treated to a three hour hapless definition of “edge” and “leadership,” a rehash of previous quotes on those terms, and an attempt to break down those quotes ad nauseum, to the neglect of the action on the field.

It would be one thing if the Mets had rolled into San Francisco playing the same kind of crappy baseball they had been playing earlier this season. It would be one thing if the Giants had stomped all over them, or if the series was tied. But the Mets went into this game having one three out of the four.  The commentary bore no resemblance to the Mets’ performance on the field recently nor to their performance in this series in particular. GUYS: THEY WON THREE OUT OF FOUR. THAT’S CALLED WINNING THE SERIES. Did you not notice this, while you sat in the press box blathering away with no one to call you on your bs?

I was in no shape to report on the game last night (since I am nursing horrific allergies) so I will apologize and bring you these quality links instead:

John Miller looked like a canary reading the yellow pages last night

Posted by kavh  on  05/18  at  08:56 AM

My dad (lives in Chicago) and I usually text back and forth during games. Its the most bonding we get nowadays being so far apart. We were both so aggrevated by Joe Morgan and then Phillips (who I can usually tolerate) starts chiming in. At one point Morgan interupted Phillips’ diatribe on leadership to critize beltran trying to steal third with two strike becuase he’s in the line of site of the batter and that may distract him.
People in Cincinnati never really have a real reverence for Joe Morgan. I always chalked that up to latent racism. I’ve now decided its becaseu he’s a giant moron. It was at that point I turnned the game off and watchted the rest on gameday while listening to Howie on theFan.

Posted by matt in oh  from  middle of nowhere, oh  on  05/18  at  09:30 AM

I have never liked the ESPN broadcast of ballgames. Joe Morgan’s commentary makes me crazy. So many interesting things go on during a game and he is so fixated on what he’s talking about that he misses most of them.
Last night was a good example of this - and a reminder for why I mute the TV when Mets games are on ESPN.

Posted by Rachel  from  Manchester, NH  on  05/18  at  10:12 AM

To Morgan’s credit he spent most of the night trying to be the voice of reason to Steve Phillips stupid on going rants about things he knows nothing about. I’ve found Joe Morgan does better when teamed with Costas but Miller is a nightmare. And no Mets fan can stand Steve Phillips so I don’t understand why ESPN would let him work a game.

Seriously though now that MLB Network is on TV I barely watch ESPN anymore because they are terribad now save Peter Gammons and maybe Buster Onley. They suffer from jock and insider syndrome when hiring. Though admittedly the MLB N has some really bad jocks that can barely talk as well. I htink Howard Cosell’s prophetic speech of the jockocracy in sport broadcasting being it’s downfall has been coming to fruition the last decade or so. I’m sick of guys that can barely talkt being in a booth just because they used to play. SNY got lucky with Darling because he’s pro and Hernandez is amusing at least and knows his limits. But so many of the others are just awful.

Anyway it was a frustrating game but Cain had one of those nights where he got the lucky pitches and made it across the tightrope. In a 162 game season these games will happen and beside the balks Pelfrey pitched great. I will take him needing to work that out than the previous issues as I don’t think he will have this issue int he future.

All in all I still feel pretty good about this team, for now. I think we may have to work out Delgado’s missing bat with more than Sheffield, unless he keep playing better like he seems to be.

Posted by Dave  from  NYC, USA, Earth, The Universe  on  05/18  at  01:39 PM

I was very irritated by the conversation. Yeah, maybe discuss it for one inning, but it kept going. Seemed pointless after two minutes. There are players that are stepping up into “leadership”, but since the ESPN crew does not announce Mets games day in and day out, there’s no reason for them to critique.

Posted by Melanie  from  MD  on  05/18  at  02:33 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus

Next entry: SPEECHLESS, PT. 2.

Previous entry: WELCOME BACK.

<< Back to main