PHP Cache-Buster Option

Meet MetsGrrl

Twitter

Search















Thursday, March 12, 2009

THEY JUST SHOULD HAVE KEPT THE OLD SIGNS.

Mets Decline to Buy Name for Subway Station at Citi Field

So on Tuesday, transit officials informed the Mets that when the subway station (currently named after the team’s former home, the now-demolished Shea Stadium) was rechristened, it would not actually use the name of the new ballpark.

Instead, the station, on the No. 7 line, will be called simply Mets/Willets Point. New signs will go up soon replacing the old signs, which say Willets Point/Shea Stadium.The nearby Long Island Rail Road station will be renamed in the same way.

The MTA shouldn’t do any of this. They should just keep the signs. The E train still terminates at the World Trade Center, and I am quite fine and rather happy that it does and that it was never changed. I’m not trying to compare the two, by any means, but in this time of budget cuts and the fact that it took me an hour and a half to get to work on a sunny, clear and dry day due to subway malfunction, I would be quite happy for the MTA to save their cash and not change the signs. Do they think it will confuse people? If someone doesn’t see the mammoth stadium out the window which has a large orange sign reading CITI FIELD, or are unable to take their cues to leave the train from the gazillions of people wearing Mets gear who get up en masse when the train pulls into the station, then there is no hope for them and no signage of any kind whatsoever will be able to assist. I would make jokes about the inability of fans of various rival teams not being able to read anyway, but those would be cheap and predictable. (You can make those yourselves. I will wait.)

It is irksome that the Mets organization could not cough up some kind of token fee for this, given the fact that the subway is what brings a large portion of the people who come to games to their front door. I am conflicted, however, because I am absolutely delighted that the subway station will not say anything about Citi. In the end, that’s a bigger win for me.

 

Posted by Caryn at 12:20 PM

I agree I would hate for the signs to say citifield.  It is still Shea in my minds eye and always will be.

Posted by Andre M. T  from  Mineola  on  03/12  at  02:41 PM

i think that it would be a conflict of intrest to use citi’s name since the would get free advertising - which i beieve is against the citys code of ethics

Posted by rustyjr  from  staten island  on  03/12  at  03:21 PM

Rusty, you need to read the article. The point was that the MTA wanted money in order to use a corporate name on the station. No money, no name. That was the point, that the Mets wouldnt give up money to have the stadium’s name on the stop.

Posted by Caryn  from  Brooklyn, NY  on  03/12  at  03:24 PM

sorry caryn -i glanced over it here at work - as per the paying for the signs -if it were to say ’ citi field’ then i feel that citi bank should pony up for the signs but of course them taking tarp money renders the point moot

Posted by rustyjr  from  s.i  on  03/12  at  04:50 PM

I totally agree. Anything that we can do to keep the memory of Shea alive is fine for me! I am having a really hard time with this change - losing Shea… I haven’t been home to NYC yet, so I haven’t been there. I know it’ll break my heart. Sigh.

Posted by Rachel  from  Manchester, NH  on  03/16  at  05:53 PM

how did i never hear of your blog before? we had another reader from NH last year. maybe he will be back.

Posted by Caryn  from  Brooklyn, NY  on  03/16  at  05:57 PM

Much like how you started - I do this for fun, as a personal outlet. I don’t think too many people read my blog except my famiy, my boyfriend and a handful of friends. You’re an exceptional writer! I added you to my iGoogle site to keep up with what you write! :) Nice to meet you!

Posted by Rachel  from  Manchester, NH  on  03/17  at  10:10 AM

I think one reason that the MTA is not putting up signs with “CitiField” on them, is there is still a good chance the federal government will force CitiCorp to pull the plug on the naming rights contract in order to get their hands on the bailout funds.  The MTA is probably playing a “wait and see” game rather than have to put up new signs again in a couple of months.

Posted by Neil O  from  Malverne, NY  on  03/17  at  11:58 PM
blog comments powered by Disqus

Next entry: GETTING CLOSER.

Previous entry: THE JOHAN SITUATION.

<< Back to main